
Enjoy fast, free delivery, exclusive deals, and award-winning movies & TV shows with Prime
Try Prime
and start saving today with fast, free delivery
Amazon Prime includes:
Fast, FREE Delivery is available to Prime members. To join, select "Try Amazon Prime and start saving today with Fast, FREE Delivery" below the Add to Cart button.
Amazon Prime members enjoy:- Cardmembers earn 5% Back at Amazon.com with a Prime Credit Card.
- Unlimited Free Two-Day Delivery
- Streaming of thousands of movies and TV shows with limited ads on Prime Video.
- A Kindle book to borrow for free each month - with no due dates
- Listen to over 2 million songs and hundreds of playlists
- Unlimited photo storage with anywhere access
Important: Your credit card will NOT be charged when you start your free trial or if you cancel during the trial period. If you're happy with Amazon Prime, do nothing. At the end of the free trial, your membership will automatically upgrade to a monthly membership.

Download the free Kindle app and start reading Kindle books instantly on your smartphone, tablet, or computer - no Kindle device required.
Read instantly on your browser with Kindle for Web.
Using your mobile phone camera - scan the code below and download the Kindle app.
Image Unavailable
Color:
-
-
-
- To view this video download Flash Player
SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome Paperback – Illustrated, September 6, 2016
Purchase options and add-ons
New York Times Bestseller
A New York Times Notable Book
Named one of the Best Books of the Year by the Wall Street Journal, the Economist,Foreign Affairs, and Kirkus Reviews
Finalist for the National Book Critics Circle Award (Nonfiction)
Shortlisted for the Cundill Prize in Historical Literature
Finalist for the Los Angeles Times Book Prize (History)
A San Francisco Chronicle Holiday Gift Guide Selection
A New York Times Book Review Editors’ Choice Selection
A sweeping, "magisterial" history of the Roman Empire from one of our foremost classicists shows why Rome remains "relevant to people many centuries later" (Atlantic).
In SPQR, an instant classic, Mary Beard narrates the history of Rome "with passion and without technical jargon" and demonstrates how "a slightly shabby Iron Age village" rose to become the "undisputed hegemon of the Mediterranean" (Wall Street Journal). Hailed by critics as animating "the grand sweep and the intimate details that bring the distant past vividly to life" (Economist) in a way that makes "your hair stand on end" (Christian Science Monitor) and spanning nearly a thousand years of history, this "highly informative, highly readable" (Dallas Morning News) work examines not just how we think of ancient Rome but challenges the comfortable historical perspectives that have existed for centuries. With its nuanced attention to class, democratic struggles, and the lives of entire groups of people omitted from the historical narrative for centuries, SPQR will to shape our view of Roman history for decades to come.
100 illustrations; 16 pages of color; 5 maps- Print length608 pages
- LanguageEnglish
- PublisherLiveright
- Publication dateSeptember 6, 2016
- Dimensions5.5 x 1.1 x 8.3 inches
- ISBN-101631492225
- ISBN-13978-1631492228
Book recommendations, author interviews, editors' picks, and more. Read it now.
Frequently bought together

More items to explore
- Rome had projected its obsessions with the apparently unending cycle of civil conflict back onto its founder.Highlighted by 2,045 Kindle readers
- The message is clear: however far back you go, the inhabitants of Rome were always already from somewhere else.Highlighted by 1,799 Kindle readers
- SPQR takes its title from another famous Roman catchphrase, Senatus PopulusQue Romanus, ‘The Senate and People of Rome’.Highlighted by 1,459 Kindle readers
Editorial Reviews
Review
― Greg Woolf, Wall Street Journal
"Though she here claims that 50 years of training and study have led up to SPQR, Beard wears her learning lightly. As she takes us through the brothels, bars, and back alleys where the populus Romanus left their imprint, one senses, above all, that she is having fun."
― James Romm, New Republic
"By the time Beard has finished, she has explored not only archaic, republican, and imperial Rome, but the eastern and western provinces over which it eventually won control…She moves with ease and mastery though archaeology, numismatics, and philology, as well as a mass of written documents on stone and papyrus."
― G. W. Bowersock, New York Review of Books
"In SPQR, her wonderful concise history, Mary Beard unpacks the secrets of the city's success with a crisp and merciless clarity that I have not seen equaled anywhere else."
― Ferdinand Mount, New York Times Book Review
"Beard does precisely what few popularizers dare to try and plenty of dons can’t pull off: She conveys the thrill of puzzling over texts and events that are bound to be ambiguous, and she complicates received wisdom in the process. Her magisterial new history of Rome, SPQR…is no exception…. The ancient Romans, Beard shows, are relevant to people many centuries later who struggle with questions of power, citizenship, empire, and identity."
― Emily Wilson, The Atlantic
"A masterful new chronicle…. Beard is a sure-footed guide through arcane material that, in other hands, would grow tedious. Sifting myth from fact in dealing with the early history of the city, she enlivens―and deepens―scholarly debates by demonstrating how the Romans themselves shaped their legendary beginnings to short-term political ends…. Exemplary popular history, engaging but never dumbed down, providing both the grand sweep and the intimate details that bring the distant past vividly to life."
― The Economist
About the Author
Product details
- Publisher : Liveright; Reprint edition (September 6, 2016)
- Language : English
- Paperback : 608 pages
- ISBN-10 : 1631492225
- ISBN-13 : 978-1631492228
- Item Weight : 2.31 pounds
- Dimensions : 5.5 x 1.1 x 8.3 inches
- Best Sellers Rank: #5,491 in Books (See Top 100 in Books)
- Customer Reviews:
About the author

Discover more of the author’s books, see similar authors, read book recommendations and more.
Customer reviews
Customer Reviews, including Product Star Ratings help customers to learn more about the product and decide whether it is the right product for them.
To calculate the overall star rating and percentage breakdown by star, we don’t use a simple average. Instead, our system considers things like how recent a review is and if the reviewer bought the item on Amazon. It also analyzed reviews to verify trustworthiness.
Learn more how customers reviews work on AmazonCustomers say
Customers find this history book engaging and well-written, with one review noting its ability to contextualize ancient events. Moreover, the book provides an excellent analysis of the founding of Rome and is entertaining to read. However, the scholarly content receives mixed reactions, with several customers finding it not very engrossing and excessively repetitive. Additionally, the social context and length receive mixed feedback, with some appreciating the depth while others find it too long.
AI-generated from the text of customer reviews
Customers find the book highly readable, describing it as an amazing and enthralling read that does not disappoint.
"...SPQR is a meaty work with a lot of events, analysis and ideas to digest...." Read more
"...quite engaging. As Rome became richer and more powerful, it was transformed from an oligarchic republic to a failed state...." Read more
"...In conclusion, "SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome" is a compelling and deeply researched work that offers valuable insights into the complexities of..." Read more
"...It was so interesting to listen to that I rarely felt compelled to speed it up as has often happened with other Audiobooks that drone on and on and..." Read more
Customers find the book informative and enlightening, describing it as a scholarly work that opens up the history of Rome, with interesting tidbits throughout.
"...It gives the reader a vivid insight into the various lives of the Romans, from emperor to slave." Read more
"...not without flaws, SPQR presents a concise and very readable history of Ancient Rome from its beginnings (legendary and otherwise) to the year 212...." Read more
"...Comprehensive Coverage:** Beard does an exceptional job of covering a vast period, from the foundation of Rome in the 8th century BC to the fall of..." Read more
"...When we don’t know exactly what happened, she explains the various theories so we can move on. But it’s never boring or tedious...." Read more
Customers praise the book's pacing, finding it a well-told and engaging read by a true scholar, with a vivid narrative that is magnificently detailed.
"Mary Beard writes in a breezy, often anecdotal, style which makes her book both informative and entertaining...." Read more
"...Although, not without flaws, SPQR presents a concise and very readable history of Ancient Rome from its beginnings (legendary and otherwise) to the..." Read more
"...Engaging Writing Style:** Beard's writing is both scholarly and accessible...." Read more
"This book is a masterpiece of history. Exciting, easy to understand, and comprehensive. An effortless, satisfying read...." Read more
Customers praise the book's historical content, particularly its analysis of Rome's founding and political development, with one customer highlighting its fascinating insights into the lives of ordinary Romans.
"Mary Beard is perhaps the best known and most popular historian of Ancient Rome. After reading SPQR, I can understand why...." Read more
"...Beard challenges traditional narratives and invites readers to reconsider established assumptions about Rome's history and its impact on the modern..." Read more
"This book is a masterpiece of history. Exciting, easy to understand, and comprehensive. An effortless, satisfying read...." Read more
"...critical aspects of Roman society, including class struggles, democratic developments, and the voices often omitted from mainstream narratives...." Read more
Customers find the book entertaining, describing it as a fascinating and engaging general history that keeps readers interested and is extremely fun to listen to.
"...often anecdotal, style which makes her book both informative and entertaining...." Read more
"This book is a masterpiece of history. Exciting, easy to understand, and comprehensive. An effortless, satisfying read...." Read more
"...It is a very well-done and interesting discussion of what that meant -- and what it didn't, and the varied reactions of the newly enfranchised...." Read more
"...of a unifying criterion that sounded to me at once serviceable, interesting, and original...." Read more
Customers have mixed reactions to the book's social context, with some appreciating how it goes in depth and provides a lot of detail, while others find it bogged down with too much information.
"...Cons:** - **Overwhelming Detail:** At times, the sheer amount of information and the dense presentation can be overwhelming, particularly for..." Read more
"...cold but is very adept in explaining it in an engaging and non-condescending manner...." Read more
"...Fun book, but unfocused, and ultimately wishywashy." Read more
"...It is also, whenever the historical evidence permits it, about ordinary people, laws, institutions, and inequality...." Read more
Customers have mixed opinions about the book's length, with several finding it too long.
""SPQR: A History of Ancient Rome" by Mary Beard offers an expansive and nuanced exploration of one of history's most influential civilizations...." Read more
"...The book is exhaustive, and it was hard for me as a reader to go through more than a handful of pages at a time...." Read more
"This is a big book. That is it covers big themes over a large stretch of time, the first Roman Millennium, from the founding of the city to the..." Read more
"...My only minor beef is that there are many long passages that seemingly could have been shortened and, perhaps beneficially, allowed a discourse of..." Read more
Customers find the scholarly content of the book unengaging, repetitive, and confusing.
"...Secondly, the ancient world was full of brutality, uncertainty, and hardship...." Read more
"...Professor Beard's book was a joy to read, despite its deficiencies as an overall narrative...." Read more
"...Her ability to distill complex historical events into engaging narratives is commendable. - **..." Read more
"...of Ancient Rome" rather than "The History..." This isn't a crisp chronological narration of events...." Read more
Reviews with images

A Deep Dive into Roman History"
Top reviews from the United States
There was a problem filtering reviews. Please reload the page.
- Reviewed in the United States on January 25, 2016Mary Beard writes in a breezy, often anecdotal, style which makes her book both informative and entertaining. SPQR covers the history of ancient Rome from its founding by Romulus to the reign of Emperor Caracalla, who, in the year 202 A.D. granted Roman citizenship to the entire free male population of the empire. This is a very ambitious work and is well worth reading. Beard not only delves into the history of ancient Rome, but also has a lot to say about its sociology. She concerns herself not only with the famous personages but also with the lower classes and their lives, with long glimpses of what went on in the bars and eateries where the ordinary people hung out. In one such establishment in Pompeii, there was a frieze picturing seven notable Greek philosophers, but rather than discussing deep philosophical topics, they are depicted as giving scatological advice. She also writes extensively on the conditions of women, slaves and freed slaves.
Beard at times seems to have a cynical attitude toward the Romans; at least, toward the movers and shakers. For example, she says about the civil war between Caesar and Pompey: “The irony was that Pompey, their figurehead, was no less an autocrat than Caesar. Whichever side won, as Cicero again observed, the result was to be much the same: slavery for Rome. What came to be seen as a war between liberty and one man rule was really a war to choose between rival emperors.” Personally, I have a bit of difficulty swallowing this, because Pompey, as egotistical as he was, had ample opportunities to march on Rome and take over as dictator in the manner of Sulla and Caesar, but he never did. And if Cato the Younger, arguably the most obstinately principled notable in history, believed that Pompey had the same ambitions as Caesar to become an autocrat, we would have declared “plague on both your houses” and stayed home rather than followed Pompey into exile.
Beard relies on the writings of Cicero for much of her analysis, and she gives him extensive coverage in SPQR. This is understandable since more of Cicero’s writings have survived than any other writer of his time.
Beard has no liking for Augustus, and at one point refers to him as a “reptile.” She does make it very clear that he was a man of remarkable gifts, able to walk that tightrope of Roman power and gaining support of the Roman elite where his Great Uncle Julius Caesar failed to do so. It probably helped that the proscriptions of the second triumvirate killed off most of the opposition. Under Augustus’ rule the Senate ceased to be a governing body and turned into a sort of civil service. Any opposition that wasn’t killed off was bought off. She describes Augustus as “a poacher turned game keeper.”
Beard also makes the point that during the next two hundred years after the end of the Republic it didn’t really matter who the emperor was or whether he was “good” or “bad.” I need to take some issue with that notion as well. If an emperor was particularly rapacious, as in the case of Nero, it could cause considerable unrest in the provinces. It was Nero’s instructions to confiscate the lands and possessions of Prasutagus, the husband of Boudicca, upon his death, that led to Boudicca’s rebellion which destroyed three Roman cities and killed an estimated 70 to 80 thousand Romans and Britons. One wonders if the same thing would have happened under a less rapacious Emperor. One suspects that Nero’s rapaciousness was also one of the causes of the full scale revolt that took place in Judea toward the end of his reign. None of the 14 emperors during this period were really “good” by modern standards, but some were more rapacious than others, and the quality of the emperor did have an effect on the running of the empire.
SPQR is a meaty work with a lot of events, analysis and ideas to digest. It gives the reader a vivid insight into the various lives of the Romans, from emperor to slave.
- Reviewed in the United States on February 14, 2016Mary Beard is perhaps the best known and most popular historian of Ancient Rome. After reading SPQR, I can understand why. Although, not without flaws, SPQR presents a concise and very readable history of Ancient Rome from its beginnings (legendary and otherwise) to the year 212. SQPR advances more or less in historical order. For each broad period, it discusses culture, society, and history before it jumps to another period. While some have called the book “revisionist,” to my mind it does an excellent job of presenting different hypotheses—some traditional and some new. While this is not a page turner in the classic sense of the term, it is well-written and easy to read.
Beard covers the major battles and political events, however much of the book focuses on what we know and do not know about Rome’s people, its subjects, its society, and its culture. She does an impressive job bringing together archeological evidence, documents, and common sense to reconstruct Ancient Rome. Her aim, as she explains, is to show a full portrait of ancient Rome, based on what we know and on our current thinking. In other words, the history of “the Senate and People of Rome” the English rendering of the SPQR.
Before 390 BCE or so, we only have Rome’s founding myths and legends. Beard looks at these stories and at many different elements of archeological evidence. This allows her to put together a number of different possibly histories of the early history. Did Romulus found Rome after being raised by a she-wolf and killing his twin brother? No. But many of the origin stories and legends may have some basis in fact.
As the book moves forward, it focuses more and more on what we know from the documentary evidence and tries to answer questions about the period. For example, how revolutionary or populist were Julius Caesar or rabble rousers like Clodius? How dedicated was Brutus and friends to the cause of liberty? How did Romans transfer large sums of money? Or how many people really knew how to read and write (20%?).
Beard offers a great deal of insight about the Roman republic, both as it rises to power and is it falls into civil war and political chaos. I found her discussion of the rise of warlords (Sulla, Pompey, Caesar, etc.) quite engaging. As Rome became richer and more powerful, it was transformed from an oligarchic republic to a failed state. More money, greater inequality, and less stability.
To my mind, the books starts to lose its steam after the reign of Augustus Caesar (31 BC to 14 AD). Augustus (who was still called Octavian), through cunning and military force, is able to stabilize the republic and create a monarchy that restores the peace. Beard explains in detail how Augustus sets up his republican monarchy, along with its compromises and accommodations.
However Beard provides little discussion of what happens next. While she does outline the reigns of the twelve legitimate emperors from Tiberius to Caracalla (there were two short civil wars during this period), it is done in short form. Possibly Nero and Domitian were not as bloody as history tells us; perhaps Caligula was not as mad as much as maddening (to the Roman elite). There is a good discussion of the expansion of Christianity in its first two centuries. Beard also discusses the expansion of “Romanization” as the empire expands.
The narrative ends in 212, the year that Caracalla grants citizenship to the entire free population. This was on the cusp of the so-called “Crisis of the Third Century.” As Beard herself points out, it is not clear why citizenship was extended or what this meant in practice. I think that this date was chosen because the empire that emerged after sixty years of revolts and civil wars was a very different sort of place with very different rules. It is not an entirely satisfactory answer but at some point the book does have to end.
Looking back two thousand years, it is quite common to ask what we can learn from Rome or if we (our civilization) is falling like the Roman Empire fell. Mary Beard argues that there is little that we can directly learn from Rome. From this book, I learned that a lot of modern institutions that we take for granted—ranging from targeted social safety nets to a proto-nation state to the republican government that is really an authoritarian dictatorship—have their origins in Ancient Rome. Certainly, we are not destined to repeat anything but there is much that we can learn.
Top reviews from other countries
- AndresReviewed in Mexico on December 17, 2024
5.0 out of 5 stars Intense
Not the story of Rome you want but story of Rome you need. An extremely insightful work by Mary Beard into the history of Ancient Rome, its emperors, citizens, slaves and whatnot.
First chapters may scream challenging book, but as the book progresses, you’ll see why the Author provides such rich content and notice that you have actually learned something.
Thank you MB
- AnselmReviewed in the United Kingdom on August 18, 2019
5.0 out of 5 stars Roman history for grownups
“History is just one damned thing after another”, goes a famous quote. And that’s what many introductory history books sound like: “First this happened, then that happened”. They might go as far as investigating causation (“this happened because that happened”) and even context (“this happened because of these circumstances”). But they don’t take the next step.
I’m currently reading in parallel Michael Burleigh’s book and Richard Evans’ trilogy on the Third Reich. They’re of this type. Now, that’s no criticism. For history that recent, the facts are going to be well-established enough not to warrant discussion in the main text, at least in a book intended for general rather than specialist readership. Sources can be relegated to footnotes for those keen and knowledgeable enough to follow them up. The facts material to, say, Hitler’s assumption of the German Chancellorship in January 1933 are not in dispute, and a lay reader like me is content to assume that the historian has done their homework with the sources, and to get on with following the narrative.
Ancient history is different. There are gaps. That’s also true of modern history, of course, but those in its ancient counterpart are so fundamental that a simple narrative history is actually misleading, because to say the equivalent of “Hitler assumed the Chancellorship on January 30th 1933” might very well not be true at all. How do we know he did? Because sources tell us. But what are those sources for ancient history?
When we’re told that in 509 BCE Lucius Junius Brutus forced Tarquinus Superbus, the last of the Roman kings, into exile in order to establish the liberty of the Roman people, that Tarquin made an alliance with the Etruscan king Lars Porsenna and besieged Rome in order to get his throne back, that the Etruscan army was prevented from crossing a key bridge across the Tiber by Horatius Cocles defending it single-handed, or almost single-handed, that the Etruscans abandoned the siege out of admiration for Roman spunk, and that Tarquinus’ Latin allies were finally defeated at the Battle of Lake Regillus in 499 BCE, it comes as something of a shock to then read in Beard’s “SPQR” that “it is only in the first century BCE that we can start to explore Rome, close up and in vivid detail, through contemporary eyes.” The earliest author to describe these foundational events is the historian Livy, writing in the time of Caesar Augustus, the first Roman emperor, half a millennium later. That raises the obvious question of how reliable this information about a series of events at least as significant for ancient Rome as Hitler’s accession to the Chancellorship was for Weimar Germany actually is.
This is the kind of question that’s at the heart of Beard’s book. On one level, it’s a history of ancient Rome from its foundation to 212 CE. As such, as pointed out by several previous reviewers (both positive and negative), it requires at least a basic knowledge of the subject. Noting these comments, I read all the Wikipedia articles on ancient Rome and its various aspects before embarking on this book. I was glad I did, although I’m not convinced I needed to. If, like one reviewer, I had complained about Beard's skimpy treatment of, say, the Punic Wars, I would have missed what her book actually is.
As much as a history of Rome, it's a history of the history of Rome. It asks the raft of questions that are an essential part of what we “know” (yes, that’s “know” in quotation marks) about it. How do we know what we think we know about a particular event or set of circumstances? What are the primary sources? How long after the event were they written? Why did the authors write what they did? For whom? Should we merely take their words at face value, or read them “against the grain”? What additional information can this reading between the lines reveal? How representative of his world and his time is a single main source for a whole period, like Cicero for the late Republic and the Civil Wars? How well does one source triangulate with othera(s)? What happens if they contradict one another? And how does all this tie in with archaeology?
This “history of history” is just as exciting a story as the one about “what actually happened”, and not just because the former is foundational to the latter. Even in contemporary history it enters the picture when, for example, David Irving’s misrepresentations of evidence are brought to light in his discussions of the Holocaust and the bombing of Dresden. We trust historians to do their work honestly, and nothing is as honest as actually showing the basis of your conclusions. It’s like a medieval timber-framed house in which the supporting structural members are a prominent feature of the design rather than being hidden behind an elegant facade. Beard does this par excellence in “SPQR”, elegantly combining the story with the story of the story in one engrossing narrative.
One model of history is the “Great Man” (yes, almost invariably “man”, unless we’re talking about great singers) view, in which the narrative consists of the doings of individual figures who are said to exercise a decisive influence on their societies. For ancient Rome, this would be the Mariuses and Sullas, the Pompeys and Caesars. From Augustus on, the history of Rome on this reading is of course the history of the emperors.
This is partly due to the simple fact that it tends to be the rich and powerful who leave the traces in the record. They build the buildings that survive, they command the armies that win (or lose) and that determine the fates of thousands and millions, it is their doings that are the subjects of sculpture and painting and monument and writing. The proles, meanwhile, pass unnoticed and unremarked unless they riot or rebel. Beard points out that the Roman Empire consisted primarily of some 50 million people, most of them peasant farmers who remain undifferentiated and anonymous because pretty much all evidence of them has vanished. Palaces can survive; peasant huts tend not to. But we do have some hope of reconstructing, to some degree, the lives, at least in the aggregate, of city dwellers, especially those million inhabitants of Rome who weren’t the few thousand elites. This is largely thanks to archaeology.
That’s why, if I had to choose my favourite chapter in the whole book, it would probably be Chapter 11, in which Beard determines just how much the evidence can tell us about the plebs. The answer is: more than you might think. Most Romans lived in “insulae”, multi-story apartment blocks, which is how a million could be crammed into such a relatively small footprint. Where and how they lived, what and where they ate and what they spent their little money on can all be determined, at least sufficiently for a mildly imaginative historical novelist to reconstruct an urban Roman scene and to get inside the heads of its ordinary citizens. Three conclusions would surprise us: Rome wasn’t zoned (the poor lived cheek by jowl with the rich throughout the city), the best apartments in insulae were on the lower, not the upper floors, and poor people ate out while rich ones dined at home.
Parallel to her examination of ordinary lives, Beard tries to determine what the impact on Rome was throughout the Empire. How much did Roman rule affect the inhabitants of Gaul or Egypt or Asia (i.e. modern western Turkey)? What did “being Roman” actually mean to a rural inhabitant of what is now Western Europe? How far down did "Romanisation" extend into the conquered societies?
And what did it mean to Romans themselves? This is a theme to which Beard periodically returns. We all have an image of our society, certain assumptions we tacitly make about our culture. It’s part of our mental makeup, the part that relates to our corporate rather than individual identities. What were Romans’ attitudes to Rome? These are intimately entwined (and perhaps enshrined?) in their city’s history, which was actually largely mythical – certainly the more so the further back it went. What they “knew” about Romulus and Remus and Aeneas reflected their own ambivalence, which was expressed in various ways throughout the near-millennium that it took for Rome to rise from an average Latin hilltop settlement whose wars were fought against enemies ten miles distant to superpower status.
Much of this evidence is, of course, skimpy in the extreme, far too much so to draw concrete conclusions. Beard again makes clear when this is so, and what such consensus or disagreement as there may be among historians and archaeologists on a given topic are. The only thing I wish she had specified is in her closing: in her discussion of the Arch of Constantine, I feel she could have made the difference between the figures on it that were recycled from earlier monuments and those freshly carved for it clear, in order to illustrate artistically her thesis about the new nature of the Empire after 212 CE.
The Kindle version works as well as you could expect. There's X-ray, for what it's worth, and the index is active as well as the table of contents. A minor exception is the (very useful) timeline at the end, which comes across as some kind of PDF. The fairly small font can’t be enlarged, and its various sections are of slightly different sizes, so you have to squint a bit. But it’s worth it – as is the entire book. If you want to know what happened in ancient Rome, read an introductory work. If you want to understand ancient Rome and how we’ve come to know about it, this is the book for you.
- Julio Cesar de M. SproesserReviewed in Brazil on March 11, 2025
5.0 out of 5 stars Wonderful !
Wonderful !
-
Giuseppe ChimentoReviewed in Italy on July 7, 2016
5.0 out of 5 stars SPQR: You must read it!
Un libro straordinario. Per l'impostazione innanzi tutto: l'inizio "in medias res" (la congiura di Catilina), tale da catturare - da subito - l'attenzione del lettore. Per la trattazione scorrevole, ma mai banale, che ti fa vivere e toccare con mano lo sforzo e l'emozione dello storico che trae i segni di una possibile verità da reperti della natura più disparata (una lapide tombale di struttura palmirena scavata in Inghilterra, un rostro punico ripescato nelle acque siciliane, e tanto, tanto altro ancora). Per la capacità narrativa e di sintesi che consente all'autrice di racchiudere in poco più di 500 densissime pagine mille anni di storia, dalla fondazione di Roma all'editto di Caracalla, che attribuì la cittadinanza romana a tutti i liberi residenti entro i confini dell'impero.
Ne viene fuori un quadro affascinante, innanzi tutto - ne sono sicuro - per la stessa autrice, che ha la capacità di trasmettere al lettore questa sua emozione i fronte a una civiltà variegata e inclusiva, nella quale hanno convissuto popoli diversissimi per livello di civilizzazione, per etnia, per lingua. La sterminata bibliografia proposta (ma, ovviamente, non esaustiva come la stessa autrice ammette) è fondamentalmente limitata ai testi in lingua inglese, a parte, naturalmente, i documenti originali latini o greci, per i quali, comunque si propongono le traduzioni o i siti web ove rintracciarle. Non so se questa sia stata una scelta dell'autrice, fatta considerando che il volume è indirizzato a non specialisti come me, ma è comunque istruttivo per un italiano (anche se io ho letto il volume in lingua inglese) scoprire quanti studiosi fuori d'Italia dedicano la propria attività professionale alla storia della civiltà romana. E per lo più si tratta, è importante dirlo, di studi assai recenti.
In conclusione: se siete appassionati di storia in genere e di storia romana in particolare, dovete leggere questo libro; se non lo siete cominciate a leggerlo ugualmente: appassionerà anche voi.
- IanReviewed in Australia on March 3, 2024
5.0 out of 5 stars Great Read - A look behind the scenes of what you think you know about Rome
Reading is not generally my favorite pastime, but I really enjoyed reading this book. Mary Beard takes you behind the popular stories & commonly held understandings of Rome and many of its key characters and events to uncover what is potentially real & what is fiction. Its an illuminating insight into what you thought you knew about ancient Rome from an expert in the field, using here characteristic relaxed style of communication. A must read for anyone with an interest in ancient Rome.